Archive for September, 2007

Honest People and Digital Images Save the Day!

Thursday, September 27th, 2007

I came across this story earlier in the week and wanted to share it with everyone. It really demonstrates the power of digital photography and the internet to do good when used correctly. (Apologies to all my friends in Southern California that are die hard USC fans for writing a favorable article about the Buckeyes’ fans).

On September 1st, the Ohio State Buckeyes opened their season at home facing the Youngstown State Penguins. A long time Buckeye fan, Michepicture-3.pnglle Montgomery was thrilled to attend the home opener and witness her beloved Buckeyes dominate the Penguins, winning 38-6. On the way into the stadium before the game, Michelle found a digital camera in the parking lot. She viewed the pictures on the camera’s digital display and saw photos of a father and son meeting Brutus Buckeye, the OSU mascot. Reluctant to trust campus lost and found to find the camera’s rightful owner, Michelle decided to take matters into her own hands.

Michelle took the camera home, downloaded the images to her computer and then emailed them to 14 of her closest friends and fellow Buckeye fans. She asked them to view the photos and if they did not recognize anyone to pass them along to other friends and Buckeye fans. Hundreds of emails later, John Montgomery opened his email, opened the photos only to recognize himself and his 10 year old son, Noah, posing with Brutus. He was estatic to learn that his camera was safe and Noah was thrilled as well to have the proof that he did meet Brutus Buckeye.

“It shows the power of the Internet, e-mail and the Buckeye network. It’s amazing how many Buckeye fans are out there,” said John, a 1986 Ohio State University graduate.

When I read this story I thought it really captured how good people combined with technology can achieve things that would have not been previously possible.

 

Photojojo – Fun Times with your Digital Photos

Tuesday, September 25th, 2007

For the past few months now I have been reading an online newsletter called Photojojo. The newsletter is published twice and week and I would highly recommend everyone check it out. They are constantly profiling new and cool things you can do with your pjwhite-250px.gifdigital photos, whether they be taken on a digital camera or photos you had converted to digital format everyone can find something new to do with their photos at Photojojo. The idea for Photojojo was born when two friends Amit and Kara realized they both had a love for digital photography and knowledge of all sorts of fun things to do with digital photos, but no way to share this knowledge.

“You probably own a digital camera and you’ve probably taken a bajillion photos with it. You may have printed a few. Well, it turns out there’s a whole world of things you can do with your photos and with your camera that nobody ever told you about. We find the most kick-ass photo tips, DIY projects, and gear and bring them to you. Turn a photo into a mural at home in 5 minutes, print your friends’ faces onto cupcakes, or get a bottlecap that turns any soda bottle into a tripod… subscribe and we’ll show you how.”

Topics tend to run the full gambit of digital photography which is something I love about the newsletter. Just in the last week they have profiled such things as major photography exhibits around the U.S., a way to turn your digital photos into a music video and a guide to creating your own photo journal books. In addition to the newsletter articles, you can also visit the Photojojo store and purchase all sorts of great photography related products. The site is useful, but keeps a light fun tone.

One of the best parts of the site is the forum where readers can post and discuss a wide variety of digital photography topics. Congrats to Amit and Kara on a great idea and keep up the good work over at Photojojo!

A Perfect Location for ScanDigital – “Mayberry by the Sea”

Saturday, September 22nd, 2007

Early in the planning stages of ScanDigital we knew that we wanted our entire operation to be run out of one central facility. As I have mentioned before, we place our customers and their experience at the center of every decision we make…and this was no different when it came to facility and its location. A well-located central facility is a key part of our business for a number of reasons. First, having all work take place under one roof means your materials are shipped to one location, processed and shipped back. Not only do they not leave the country, but they never even leave our facility. Secondly, from a management perspective, it allows us to keep our processing time down and provide the fastest turnaround time in the industry which is very highly valued by our customers. Finally, one well located facility allows us to draw from the most highly trained and talented professionals in the world of digital photography. I could not be more proud of the team and the high quality work they do on a day to day basis.

So a little about our facility…After looking at a number of locations with in the Los Angeles area, we all agreed that Downtown El Segundo was the ideal place to launch ScanDigital. Despite the fact that El Segundo is centrally located within the largest metropolitan area, many of the locals refer to the area as “Mayberry by the Sea” as it is truly a hidden gem within LA and has a nice, quaint small town feeling. Downtown El Segundo is easily accessible from many parts of LA. On a daily basis we have employees commuting in from Santa Monica to the North, Manhattan and Redondo Beach to the South and Hollywood, Downtown Los Angeles and Central LA to the East. This has allowed us to attract and retain a highly qualified and well-trained team, without our well-located facility (and easy access from the 105 Freeway) this task would have been much more difficult. For our facility, we selected a fantastic historic brick building that has been entirely modernized to handle our high-end scanning and computer equipment while maintaining the historic charm. The building sits next to the original city hall site and was the third building ever constructed in El Segundo. Our physical location in many ways mirrors the service we provide: taking materials from generations past and modernizing them while preserving their original appeal.

Starting this weekend, we are now open 7 days a week, providing local customers the ability to drop off orders when it is most convenient to them. For any readers located within the LA area, I would invite you to come visit our facility sometime, we would be more than happy to give you a tour.

DPI, PPI and Megapixels…Mega Confusing

Friday, September 21st, 2007

At ScanDigital I am constantly working with our customer service representatives to understand the questions our customers are frequently asking. One of the more common topics of conversation relates to the confusing world of resolution and how this is measured. Hopefully this post will shed some light on the topic.  My apologies in advance for a somewhat technical post, but I promise the next one will be much lighter reading!

First, let’s start with the commonly used terms: DPI, PPI and Megapixels. These terms are not as confusing as they may sound. In the common vernacular (and even on our website) we refer to resolution in terms of DPI or “Dots Per Inch”. What we really mean when we refer to DPI when speaking about digital images is PPI or “Pixels Per Inch”. DPI’s origin lies with traditional print methods which use patterns of dots to render photographic images on a printed page. While pixels on a monitor are square and in contact with the adjacent pixels, printed dots have space between them to make white, or no space between them to make black.

A digital image is simply a certain dimension: “x” pixels wide by “y” pixels tall. If you divide each dimension by 300, you will have the size of the image at 300ppi. When a digital image is prepared for print the pixels are converted to dots. Dots have spaces between them. 300 pixels become 150 dots and spaces, so 300ppi becomes roughly 150dpi and 150dpi is the accepted standard for printing photographic quality images.

However, it is also important to remember that everything is relative to viewing distance. 150dpi (or 300ppi) is accepted as photo quality because the average person cannot see the “dots” at a few inches away. When you move the viewer further away from the printed material, lower dpi is acceptable. A huge billboard might be printed at only 40dpi but no one notices because everyone is 50 yards away from it.

When we talk about viewing images on a monitor 72 dpi is often discussed. Technically speaking, referring to 72dpi should really be 72ppi because it has nothing to do with printing. On a computer display, a 72 pixel by 72 pixel image should take up about one inch of space on the screen. (This of course varies based on the size of the monitor and what resolution it is set to.) As a result, whenever we are asked about resolution on a customer call it is important for us to understand the intended use of the digital files. If a customer is going to only use them for digital viewing on a monitor or television, then our higher resolution option is completely unnecessary and will not be at all noticeable on a monitor. However, if the customer wishes to order large reprints than the higher resolution scan may make a huge difference in the print quality.

So, what about megapixels?

Converting dpi or ppi into megapixels simply requires a little math.  A megapixel is equal to 1 million pixels and is a measurement of area.   So lets assume a customer has a bunch of slides or negatives that they want to convert to digital format.  How many megapixels will the resulting image be?  A 2000 ppi scan of a negative or slide results in an image with an approximate size of 1,900 x 2,840 pixels or 4.7 megapixels (a very high quality image).

I hope this helps explain some of the confusion surrounding these terms!

We’ve come a long way…

Wednesday, September 5th, 2007

Yesterday marked anniversary of the original patent for the first roll-film camera and the registration of the name “Kodak”. The patent was awarded to George Eastman in 1888.

I was facinated to learn of Eastman’s story and what lead to the patent.

In his early 20s, Eastman was working as a bank clerk and purchased some photographic equipment for a vacation , but never made the vacation. george_eastman_580x.jpgHe was instantly enamored with photography, though he was less enthusiastic about the cumbersome and limiting nature of wet-plate technology. So he set out to find a better solution. Eastman continued working at the bank while devoting his evenings to experimentation. By 1880 he had devised his own dry-plate formula and went into the photographic business full time. As he ran a young company struggling to survive, Eastman began looking for new exposure methods that could bring photography to the masses. Eastman kept experimenting until he hit on the solution: cellulose. It produced a clean image and was easily spooled onto a film roller, making it compact. As we know now, this was the birth of modern camera film. By 1888, he was ready to patent the first camera using that film.Another bit of interesting trivia is the background of the word Kodak, which has become one of the most recognizable brand names ever, there is no special meaning attached to it. Eastman explained its origin: “I devised the name myself. The letter ‘K’ had been a favorite with me — it seems a strong, incisive sort of letter. It became a question of trying out a great number of combinations of letters that made words starting and ending with ‘K.’ The word ‘Kodak’ is the result.”

Source: kodak.com, Wired.com