Archive for the ‘digital photography’ Category

Respectance: Paying Homage to Our Loved Ones

Wednesday, October 10th, 2007

A few months ago I received an email from Richard Derks, the co-founder of a new company called Respectance, seeking a partnership with ScanDigital. At that time I had not heard of Respectance, but as I came to understand the company and the service it was providing I was thoroughly impressed.Respectance

Respectance is a company that allows its users to generate online tributes to deceased relatives, friends, idols and mentors, basically anyone you might want to pay a tribute to. Respectance has been called “the myspace for the deceased”, while this is a somewhat grim way of describing it, the point is that respectance provides an online social space for individuals to pay tribute to their loved ones. I think it is a fantastic service and a touching way to remember those you love in this digital age. The digital age in which we live is really about using digital technologies to enhance our lives. The ability to be able to access those old photos and fond comments about a loved one instantly from anywhere on your computer is such a step forward from having to dig out an old photo album in a box somewhere to relive these memories.

The company is the first to use the combination of rich media combined with relevant content, to provide an outlet for emotional expression. With emo-social media, Respectance has created a dedicated venue for sharing emotions and memories online, unlike all-purpose social networking sites like MySpace or Facebook, that are inappropriate for personalized tributes. As Derks describes the company:

“Respectance is establishing a new tradition for sharing memories of loved ones. Finally, there is an appropriate outlet for sharing emotions and memories of loved ones for all to appreciate, enjoy and contribute to.”

Respectance contacted us about a potential affiliate partnership because they were finding that many of their users were in need of a quality photo scanning service that could provide the fastest turnaround in the industry and they were particularly intrigued by our online gallery and ability to provide a web-based version of photos to their users. I am very proud to associate the ScanDigital name and brand with companies like Respectance.

In addition to adding Respectance as an affiliate partner, we have recently launched an official program to pursue these type of affiliate relationships. We have built a system from the ground up which allows our affiliates to track users coming to our site through their site and share in the success generated by these customers.

From time to time, I plan to highlight some of our Affiliates that I believe would be of interest to our customers.

For more information on Respectance visit: www.respectance.com

For more information check out the details using this link ScanDigital’s Affiliate Program.

Your Earth, Digital

Monday, October 8th, 2007

I wanted to share with everyone a great site that I discovered this morning. Earthshots.org is a website dedicated to digital photos from around the globe. Every day the site receives photos from hundreds of photographers and then each day selects the best image to post. Most of the photos are of animals or beautiful scenes in the wilderness, but the requirements for the contest are not particularly stringent. According to the site:

Earth Shots is looking for photographs that exhibit the beauty and diversity of our planet. Any subject matter goes. The most important requirement is that your image is interesting and striking.

They have done an fantastic job of compiling amazing shots from all over the globe. Keep up the good work. This four minute video slideshow is amazing and will give a good idea of the winning shots over a 100 day period.


Twelve Essential Photographic Rules

Thursday, October 4th, 2007

I came across this article today on photojojo and thought it would be very interesting to our readers. Hope you enjoy these tips!

From Sunny 16 to Moony 11, 8, and 5.6, these facts, formulas, and photographic rules can get you out of a jam and help you get good shots when nothing else will.


September 2007

What happens when your systems go belly-up, when all of that cutting-edge technology dies and you must rely on (gasp!) your own knowledge? It pays to have these basics in your head. They can get you out of a jam and help you get good shots when nothing else will.

1. Sunny 16 Rule
The basic exposure for an average scene taken on a bright, sunny day is f/16 at a shutter speed equivalent to one over the ISO setting—that is, f/16 at 1/100 sec at ISO 100. From this you can interpolate, and try f/22 at the beach, f/11 on a cloudy-bright day, etc.

2. Moony 11, 8, and 5.6 Rules
There are many different rules that work well when shooting the moon. One favorite for a proper exposure of a full moon is f/11 at one over the ISO setting. For pictures of a half moon, use the same shutter speed at f/8, and for a quarter moon, use the same shutter speed at f/5.6.

3. Camera Shake Rule
The slowest shutter speed at which you can safely handhold a camera is one over the focal length of the lens in use. As shutter speeds get slower, camera shake is likely to result in an increasing loss of sharpness. So, if you’re using a 50mm lens, shoot at 1/60 sec or faster. Not enough light? Use a flash, tripod, or brace your camera against a solid object.

4. Anatomical Gray Card
Metering off an 18-percent neutral gray card is a good way to get a midtone reading that will give you a good overall exposure of a scene. Forgot your gray card? Hold your open hand up so it’s facing the light, take a reading off your palm, open up one stop, and shoot. (Various skin tones rarely account for even a full-stop difference.)

5. Depth of Field Rules
When focusing on a deep subject, focus on a point about a third of the way into the picture to maximize depth of field, because the depth-of-field zone behind that point is about twice as deep as the depth-of-field zone in front of it. This works for all apertures and focal lengths, but the smaller the aperture and the shorter the focal length, and the greater the distance you shoot at, the greater the depth of field.

6. Largest Digital Print Rule
To calculate in inches the largest photo-quality print you can make with a digital camera, divide the vertical and horizontal pixel counts (see your manual) by 200. For critical applications, or if you want exhibition-quality prints, divide the pixel counts by 250.

7. Exposure Rules
The classic advice is, “Expose for the highlights, and let the shadows take care of themselves.” This works with slide film and digital. But with negative film, especially color negative, you’re better off overexposing by one stop.

8. Quick Flash-fill Rule
When using an automatic flash unit that doesn’t provide auto flash-fill ratios, set the flash’s ISO dial to twice the ISO you’re using. Meter the scene, select an f-stop, set the autoflash aperture to the same f-stop, and shoot. The resulting 2:1 flash-fill ratio will produce filled shadows one stop darker than the main subject.

9. Flash Range Rule
Want to know how much extra flash range you get by going to a faster ISO? The rule is, “Double the distance, four times the speed.” For example: If your flash is good to 20 feet at ISO 100 (film or digital), it will be good to 40 feet at ISO 400.

10. Megapixel Multiplier Rule
To double the resolution in a digital camera, you must increase the number of megapixels by a factor of four—not two. Why? The number of pixels in both the vertical and horizontal dimensions must be doubled to double the pixel density across the image sensor.

11. Action-stopping Rules
To stop action moving across the frame that’s perpendicular to the lens axis, you need shutter speeds two stops faster than action moving toward or away from you. For action moving at a 45-degree angle to the lens axis, you can use a shutter speed one stop slower. For example: If a person running toward you at moderate speed can be stopped at 1/125 sec, you’ll need a shutter speed of 1/500 sec to stop the subject moving across the frame, and a shutter speed of 1/250 sec to stop him if moving obliquely with respect to the camera.

12. Sunset Rule
To get a properly exposed sunset, meter the area directly above the sun (without including the sun). If you want the scene to look like it’s a half-hour later, stop down by one f-stop, or set exposure compensation to minus one.

Originally published November, 2004.

New Digital Insider Contributors and Authors

Wednesday, October 3rd, 2007

It has been about 2 months now that I have been working on posts for The Digital Insider. I am constantly scouring the internet for new and interesting topics and asking the team here at ScanDigital what they think our customers and readers would be interested in reading about. More often than not it is someone here on the team that has an interesting idea that lead to my posts, so I thought it was time to bring in other contributors and authors.

Our staff here is a group of highly trained individuals, with a diverse background within a variety of niches in the photography and digital photography field. For most of these people working with digital photos and technology is not just a job, its something they love. Outside of the office they are generally keeping up with the latest and greatest innovations which makes them ideal contributors to our blog. I’m excited for them to share their thoughts with you.

Tag You’re It – Geotagging technology adds a new dimension to digital photos

Wednesday, October 3rd, 2007

For a number years now cameras have had the ability to time and date stamp photos, soon another dimension will be added to your digital photos – geography. The practice of stamping images with a geographic location is known as “geotagging”. This is currently available to those who wish to do it manually through sites such as Flickr; however, the integration of digital photography technologies, online photo sharing systems and GPS tracking technologies are rapidly making it more feasible for the average shutterbug to geotag his/her images.

“Every photo was taken somewhere. That’s almost always part of the story of the photo,” said Stewart Butterfield, general manager and co-founder of Flickr, which now houses 36 million geotagged photos–roughly 3 percent of its total archive.

As the cost of integrating GPS chips with digital cameras decreases, more and more people will begin to not only have a chronological record of their images, but also a geographic record. Before the advent of digital photography people often invited guests to view their slideshows, but today in the era of photo sharing online many viewers lack an in-person guide. Geotagging is just one more way to provide a comprehensive story about someone’s photos. Imagine touring through the Alps or Italy and upon returning being able to pinpoint the exact location of a particular favorite restaurant or hotel and then recommend it to friends. Geotagging simply is an additional enhancement that increases the usefulness of your digital photos.

It is estimated that on a scale of 1 to 10, geotagging is only a 4 in terms of maturity. Clearly there are future advancements that are being developed to make geotagging a user friendly, simple experience. It will be very interesting to watch this new technology develop.

The image below demonstrates a set of geotagged images and their appearance on a map.

flickr-geotagging.png

Sources: Flickr, CNET

Honest People and Digital Images Save the Day!

Thursday, September 27th, 2007

I came across this story earlier in the week and wanted to share it with everyone. It really demonstrates the power of digital photography and the internet to do good when used correctly. (Apologies to all my friends in Southern California that are die hard USC fans for writing a favorable article about the Buckeyes’ fans).

On September 1st, the Ohio State Buckeyes opened their season at home facing the Youngstown State Penguins. A long time Buckeye fan, Michepicture-3.pnglle Montgomery was thrilled to attend the home opener and witness her beloved Buckeyes dominate the Penguins, winning 38-6. On the way into the stadium before the game, Michelle found a digital camera in the parking lot. She viewed the pictures on the camera’s digital display and saw photos of a father and son meeting Brutus Buckeye, the OSU mascot. Reluctant to trust campus lost and found to find the camera’s rightful owner, Michelle decided to take matters into her own hands.

Michelle took the camera home, downloaded the images to her computer and then emailed them to 14 of her closest friends and fellow Buckeye fans. She asked them to view the photos and if they did not recognize anyone to pass them along to other friends and Buckeye fans. Hundreds of emails later, John Montgomery opened his email, opened the photos only to recognize himself and his 10 year old son, Noah, posing with Brutus. He was estatic to learn that his camera was safe and Noah was thrilled as well to have the proof that he did meet Brutus Buckeye.

“It shows the power of the Internet, e-mail and the Buckeye network. It’s amazing how many Buckeye fans are out there,” said John, a 1986 Ohio State University graduate.

When I read this story I thought it really captured how good people combined with technology can achieve things that would have not been previously possible.

 

Photojojo – Fun Times with your Digital Photos

Tuesday, September 25th, 2007

For the past few months now I have been reading an online newsletter called Photojojo. The newsletter is published twice and week and I would highly recommend everyone check it out. They are constantly profiling new and cool things you can do with your pjwhite-250px.gifdigital photos, whether they be taken on a digital camera or photos you had converted to digital format everyone can find something new to do with their photos at Photojojo. The idea for Photojojo was born when two friends Amit and Kara realized they both had a love for digital photography and knowledge of all sorts of fun things to do with digital photos, but no way to share this knowledge.

“You probably own a digital camera and you’ve probably taken a bajillion photos with it. You may have printed a few. Well, it turns out there’s a whole world of things you can do with your photos and with your camera that nobody ever told you about. We find the most kick-ass photo tips, DIY projects, and gear and bring them to you. Turn a photo into a mural at home in 5 minutes, print your friends’ faces onto cupcakes, or get a bottlecap that turns any soda bottle into a tripod… subscribe and we’ll show you how.”

Topics tend to run the full gambit of digital photography which is something I love about the newsletter. Just in the last week they have profiled such things as major photography exhibits around the U.S., a way to turn your digital photos into a music video and a guide to creating your own photo journal books. In addition to the newsletter articles, you can also visit the Photojojo store and purchase all sorts of great photography related products. The site is useful, but keeps a light fun tone.

One of the best parts of the site is the forum where readers can post and discuss a wide variety of digital photography topics. Congrats to Amit and Kara on a great idea and keep up the good work over at Photojojo!

DPI, PPI and Megapixels…Mega Confusing

Friday, September 21st, 2007

At ScanDigital I am constantly working with our customer service representatives to understand the questions our customers are frequently asking. One of the more common topics of conversation relates to the confusing world of resolution and how this is measured. Hopefully this post will shed some light on the topic.  My apologies in advance for a somewhat technical post, but I promise the next one will be much lighter reading!

First, let’s start with the commonly used terms: DPI, PPI and Megapixels. These terms are not as confusing as they may sound. In the common vernacular (and even on our website) we refer to resolution in terms of DPI or “Dots Per Inch”. What we really mean when we refer to DPI when speaking about digital images is PPI or “Pixels Per Inch”. DPI’s origin lies with traditional print methods which use patterns of dots to render photographic images on a printed page. While pixels on a monitor are square and in contact with the adjacent pixels, printed dots have space between them to make white, or no space between them to make black.

A digital image is simply a certain dimension: “x” pixels wide by “y” pixels tall. If you divide each dimension by 300, you will have the size of the image at 300ppi. When a digital image is prepared for print the pixels are converted to dots. Dots have spaces between them. 300 pixels become 150 dots and spaces, so 300ppi becomes roughly 150dpi and 150dpi is the accepted standard for printing photographic quality images.

However, it is also important to remember that everything is relative to viewing distance. 150dpi (or 300ppi) is accepted as photo quality because the average person cannot see the “dots” at a few inches away. When you move the viewer further away from the printed material, lower dpi is acceptable. A huge billboard might be printed at only 40dpi but no one notices because everyone is 50 yards away from it.

When we talk about viewing images on a monitor 72 dpi is often discussed. Technically speaking, referring to 72dpi should really be 72ppi because it has nothing to do with printing. On a computer display, a 72 pixel by 72 pixel image should take up about one inch of space on the screen. (This of course varies based on the size of the monitor and what resolution it is set to.) As a result, whenever we are asked about resolution on a customer call it is important for us to understand the intended use of the digital files. If a customer is going to only use them for digital viewing on a monitor or television, then our higher resolution option is completely unnecessary and will not be at all noticeable on a monitor. However, if the customer wishes to order large reprints than the higher resolution scan may make a huge difference in the print quality.

So, what about megapixels?

Converting dpi or ppi into megapixels simply requires a little math.  A megapixel is equal to 1 million pixels and is a measurement of area.   So lets assume a customer has a bunch of slides or negatives that they want to convert to digital format.  How many megapixels will the resulting image be?  A 2000 ppi scan of a negative or slide results in an image with an approximate size of 1,900 x 2,840 pixels or 4.7 megapixels (a very high quality image).

I hope this helps explain some of the confusion surrounding these terms!

Digital Photos Continue to Define the Social Web

Thursday, August 23rd, 2007

I have been thinking a lot lately about the impact of digital photography on the development of the social web. Sites such as Facebook and MySpace for better and for worse allow people not only to create online profiles, but what have become full online personalities. These personalities are defined, in part, by what people are writing about themselves, but more often defined by the photos and images individuals are posting of themselves, friends, family and activities. While there is some negative impact that comes from this (college seniors being cut from job applicant pools based on inappropriate photos) for the most part I view the impact of digital photography’s involvement in the social web as a very positive one.

Groups of individuals can link and bond in ways that were never possible before. A couple of weeks ago I finally read Chris Anderson’s The Long Tail, to me the social web really is creating the long tail of socialization. Allowing groups of individuals with very distinct tastes or interests to find each other and share their common bond. Digital photos only help to accelerate the speed at which these groups can develop, both by making it easier to identify new members with a common interest and also by facilitating better information sharing capabilities. This ability to share and community build allows these groups to truly capitalize on the long tail effect.

In thinking about the topic I came across a posting by Dennis Dunleavy on his blog “The Big Picture”, he offers interesting insights to this topic as well. For those that are interested the article can be found here: http://ddunleavy.typepad.com/the_big_picture/2007/08/the-role-of-the.html

As the social web matures, it will be exciting and interesting to see the impact of these new social communities. Let me know your thoughts on the topic!

New Technologies Continue to Enhance the Power of Digital Photos

Monday, August 20th, 2007

Amazing developments continue in the world of digital photography. James Hays and Alexei A. Efros of Carnegie Mellon University released a new algorithm today professor and fourth-year PHd student at Carnegie Mellon released a powerful new algorithm today which creates the ability to fill-in blanks or replace unwanted parts of a digital photo. The algorithm draws on a huge database of more than a million images from the internet in order to seamlessly fill in the missing areas of incomplete photos.

Reasons for wanting to repair these photos span from a patch of bright light affecting the image or an unwanted person, shadow or object that is negatively impacting the image.

The algorithm is amazing in that it provides a number of different options to complete the photo allowing the user to select the one that they find most suitable. The example below demonstrates the power of the new algorithm.

example.jpg

More details can be found at the following page: http://graphics.cs.cmu.edu/projects/scene-completion/

Very interesting and ground breaking technology!