The Digital Insider

If you were to start exploring the process of getting your images scanned into a digital format you would quickly see that most often the price to scan your photos is lower than the price to scan your slides and negatives. You are probably thinking, “Great! I will just send in my photos to be scanned and hold onto my negatives for safe-keeping.” Unfortunately for a small savings you would be keeping yourself from receiving the highest possible quality.

When scanning a print you are not working from the original material (negative) so essentially it is similar to making a copy of a copy. No matter how much we can do to adjust an image and while the results are often great, the results from scanning negatives or scanning slides almost always allows for a higher quality digital image. Because of how the slides and negatives are chemically processed it allows for a color quality that cannot be met on a standard photographic print.

Many consumers assume that because of the larger size of the prints they would create better digital images but with the high quality slide and negative scanners available that is just not the case. At ScanDigital we use Nikon scanners specifically designed for 35mm negative scanning and 35mm slide scanning. They are designed to scan at a very high dpi (we offer both 2000 dpi and 4000 dpi) with Digital Ice technology that automatically fixes very small scratches and any small dust particles that didn’t get completely removed during the slide and negative cleaning.

Slide scanning is a particularly important thing to do as the life of these slides is short-lived. Ektachrome slides for example can start deteriorating rapidly after just thirty years. Many customers express concern over shipping their irreplaceable slides across the country, believing that they are safer tucked away in the closet. Unfortunately by not preserving them digitally they are suffering irreparable damage as time goes on. ScanDigital is integrated with UPS for safe, secure and trackable shipping so don’t wait, save your precious memories by sending in your slides today!

As a photography hobbyist and former semi-pro I have had quite a bit of experience in the arena of sports photography. For me sports photography was a natural fit as I am an avid sports fan and love the excitement of trying to snap that great shot right when the moment happens.

For me, none of this would have been possible without digital photography. By being able to immediately review my images on my laptop I am able to make all the adjustments I need on the fly. So when that breakaway goal is scored late in the second half I have had a chance to adjust and re-adjust my camera so I can capture the moment perfectly.

As a photographer, athletes are coming at you very quickly and the focus points can be tricky. I find along with that the lighting varies in different spots and angles on an indoor court and when outdoors you need to always take into consideration where the sun is overhead and the changing cloud conditions.
While I would like to take a perfect shot every time, I am just not that good nor will I ever be. That is why I never miss an opportunity to review the images I have taken. The instant feedback of being able to view my own work has been every bit as valuable as any instruction I have received. Knowing what angles are working best with the lighting and how to adjust my equipment gives me an edge I would not have without the digital format.

Many of my best shots can be considered lucky by others and that I just happened to be in the right place in the right time. But most all of them were later in the game when I have had a chance to make adjustments and put myself in a position to be successful. It’s amazing how lucky one can get when they put in the work to get there.
Photo Credit: AP Photo/Kevork Djansezian

Getty Images, the leading provider of stock photography and video, agreed to a buyout offer today from private equity firm Hellman & Friedman.  At ScanDigital, we continue to work closely with professional photographers wishing to digitize their life work and monetize the image through the sale of stock photography.  The move today by Hellman & Friedman supports our belief that this segment of the market will continue to grow.  Getty Images owns iStockphoto.com, a site that provides royalty free images.  This cost structure has proven itself to be particularly attractive for many web developers and companies seeking images for their website.

iStockphoto as well as other web based companies that sell stock photography continue to be a great source of ongoing income for professional photographers and are an invaluable resource for web designers and graphic artists.  Images that once could have cost hundreds of dollars now cost only a few dollars which has increased overall volume.  The stock photography industry has also grown as meta-tagging and search capabilities have been improved allowing users to more readily find and access images matching the user’s specifications.

It will be quite interesting to watch how Getty grows and changes as a company under Hellman & Friedman’s management.  It will also be interesting to see if other private equity firms make a run at Getty’s competitors, such as Corbis.  At ScanDigital we continue to be excited about our ability to assist photographers to bridge the gap from analog to digital.  It is an all around winning situation: professional photographers are able to increase their income through the sale of the images, the stock photography sites enjoy a larger library, we have additional digital conversion work and, perhaps most importantly, the end user has access to better images in a larger library at a lower cost.

From time to time I’ll wander the internet for something new and absolutely intriguing. Usually when this happens it hides behind account sign ups, which I’d probably forget the usernames and passwords anyway. If I like my latest discovery, I tend to research it and learn more about it only to bump into a few people over the weekend who shoot down the one I’ve picked in favor of something better, faster and easier than what I’ve stumbled upon. The way it seems to go more often than not as the speed of development and innovation continues so quickly it is hard to keep pace.

Recently I learned that Adobe was gearing up to move its full software line to the web. I was intrigued and began to investigate. There are a handful of companies trying to take Adobe like applications online and meet that challenge (Snipshot.com, Picnik.com, Fauxto.com just to name a few). Soon these startups will be beat or acquired by Adobe in its quest to move these applications to the web. Photoshop, the software on the lips of anyone doing image editing, is about to be integrated into a webpage. Well, to be fair “about” is a stretch I suppose. Rumor is that it will take up to a decade to make the full-blown version online, but within the year there should be a free version available.

This simply makes sense… the whole idea of having software sit online somewhere. This way the company knows exactly who’s using the software and when. No more pirated software, no need for updates/upgrades, and it pays for itself with advertisements! Yeah, I’m not too thrilled about that last part either, but I’d hope that if you subscribe to their program, you’d get those removed. Plus, it seems everyone has their pictures online somewhere to share with other people, why not fix them up a bit online first.

Now, Picnik and Snipshot are free so I’ve played around with their sites. They’re basic, but considering these applications sit within your browser, it’s amazing. Plus the average user does not need the wide spectrum of photo editing tools offered by a program with as much complexity as Photoshop. Fauxto’s site requires a sign in and going against my personal guidelines, I created an account. Now that I’ve tested a handful of these, I would say Fauxto comes the closest to Photoshop by providing layers and effects along with other goodies. I’d say check it out, but be careful before you go bragging to your buddies at the bar about your latest discovery… the next best thing is probably waiting just around the corner.

I wanted to share with everyone a great site that I discovered this morning. Earthshots.org is a website dedicated to digital photos from around the globe. Every day the site receives photos from hundreds of photographers and then each day selects the best image to post. Most of the photos are of animals or beautiful scenes in the wilderness, but the requirements for the contest are not particularly stringent. According to the site:

Earth Shots is looking for photographs that exhibit the beauty and diversity of our planet. Any subject matter goes. The most important requirement is that your image is interesting and striking.

They have done an fantastic job of compiling amazing shots from all over the globe. Keep up the good work. This four minute video slideshow is amazing and will give a good idea of the winning shots over a 100 day period.

I came across this article today on photojojo and thought it would be very interesting to our readers. Hope you enjoy these tips!

From Sunny 16 to Moony 11, 8, and 5.6, these facts, formulas, and photographic rules can get you out of a jam and help you get good shots when nothing else will.

By Jason Schneider
September 2007

What happens when your systems go belly-up, when all of that cutting-edge technology dies and you must rely on (gasp!) your own knowledge? It pays to have these basics in your head. They can get you out of a jam and help you get good shots when nothing else will.

1. Sunny 16 Rule
The basic exposure for an average scene taken on a bright, sunny day is f/16 at a shutter speed equivalent to one over the ISO setting—that is, f/16 at 1/100 sec at ISO 100. From this you can interpolate, and try f/22 at the beach, f/11 on a cloudy-bright day, etc.

2. Moony 11, 8, and 5.6 Rules
There are many different rules that work well when shooting the moon. One favorite for a proper exposure of a full moon is f/11 at one over the ISO setting. For pictures of a half moon, use the same shutter speed at f/8, and for a quarter moon, use the same shutter speed at f/5.6.

3. Camera Shake Rule
The slowest shutter speed at which you can safely handhold a camera is one over the focal length of the lens in use. As shutter speeds get slower, camera shake is likely to result in an increasing loss of sharpness. So, if you’re using a 50mm lens, shoot at 1/60 sec or faster. Not enough light? Use a flash, tripod, or brace your camera against a solid object.

4. Anatomical Gray Card
Metering off an 18-percent neutral gray card is a good way to get a midtone reading that will give you a good overall exposure of a scene. Forgot your gray card? Hold your open hand up so it’s facing the light, take a reading off your palm, open up one stop, and shoot. (Various skin tones rarely account for even a full-stop difference.)

5. Depth of Field Rules
When focusing on a deep subject, focus on a point about a third of the way into the picture to maximize depth of field, because the depth-of-field zone behind that point is about twice as deep as the depth-of-field zone in front of it. This works for all apertures and focal lengths, but the smaller the aperture and the shorter the focal length, and the greater the distance you shoot at, the greater the depth of field.

6. Largest Digital Print Rule
To calculate in inches the largest photo-quality print you can make with a digital camera, divide the vertical and horizontal pixel counts (see your manual) by 200. For critical applications, or if you want exhibition-quality prints, divide the pixel counts by 250.

7. Exposure Rules
The classic advice is, “Expose for the highlights, and let the shadows take care of themselves.” This works with slide film and digital. But with negative film, especially color negative, you’re better off overexposing by one stop.

8. Quick Flash-fill Rule
When using an automatic flash unit that doesn’t provide auto flash-fill ratios, set the flash’s ISO dial to twice the ISO you’re using. Meter the scene, select an f-stop, set the autoflash aperture to the same f-stop, and shoot. The resulting 2:1 flash-fill ratio will produce filled shadows one stop darker than the main subject.

9. Flash Range Rule
Want to know how much extra flash range you get by going to a faster ISO? The rule is, “Double the distance, four times the speed.” For example: If your flash is good to 20 feet at ISO 100 (film or digital), it will be good to 40 feet at ISO 400.

10. Megapixel Multiplier Rule
To double the resolution in a digital camera, you must increase the number of megapixels by a factor of four—not two. Why? The number of pixels in both the vertical and horizontal dimensions must be doubled to double the pixel density across the image sensor.

11. Action-stopping Rules
To stop action moving across the frame that’s perpendicular to the lens axis, you need shutter speeds two stops faster than action moving toward or away from you. For action moving at a 45-degree angle to the lens axis, you can use a shutter speed one stop slower. For example: If a person running toward you at moderate speed can be stopped at 1/125 sec, you’ll need a shutter speed of 1/500 sec to stop the subject moving across the frame, and a shutter speed of 1/250 sec to stop him if moving obliquely with respect to the camera.

12. Sunset Rule
To get a properly exposed sunset, meter the area directly above the sun (without including the sun). If you want the scene to look like it’s a half-hour later, stop down by one f-stop, or set exposure compensation to minus one.

Originally published November, 2004.

When I was growing up oh so many years ago, I was lucky to have a toy that could think. I could turn it on and off when I felt the need to process some words or to listen to the dot matrix printer peck away on some paper. Waiting for the 64KB of RAM to load up with the familiar “Okay” signal meant anything and everything was about to happen. Well, so long as anything and everything fell into the category of simple noises from an internal PC speaker and about 16 different colors on the screen. Then Microsoft’s Windows came along.

I often wonder what it was like before everyone had a car or a phone or even a television, but that’s usually while I’m fast forwarding through commercials. I also wonder what children being born today may think about the GUI (Graphical User Interface) we’re all used to. A GUI has made the computer the most diverse tool for most if not all modern computer users. Clicking and dragging an object is such a common task that it’s hard to believe there once was another way of doing it. Plus, the idea that you’re allowed to undo just about any mistake you may have made? No longer do you need a daisy wheel and white out, you’re able to copy and paste entire documents with just a few clicks and ticks (I guess clocks don’t tick too much anymore).

What has offered me a rather entertaining 20 years or so is an idea that no matter how fast computers get, they need to be a bit quicker. After figuring out how to perform a specific task and realizing some part of the machine is slowing me down, I replace it. Something newer, beefier, faster. I then get bored with the same old process and figure out a new trick which then takes about the same amount of time to process. Something new is needed again. This cycle has pushed the home computer from being a simple step up from a typewriter mixed with a calculator to a multimedia powerhouse.

About Ian: Ian is a Photo Editor at ScanDigital and joined ScanDigital with more than 10 years of digital editing experience. Prior to joining ScanDigital, Ian worked as a digital editor of photography and video. He also was involved in production work for major motion pictures such as The Longest Yard, Span’glish and The Italian Job.

It has been about 2 months now that I have been working on posts for The Digital Insider. I am constantly scouring the internet for new and interesting topics and asking the team here at ScanDigital what they think our customers and readers would be interested in reading about. More often than not it is someone here on the team that has an interesting idea that lead to my posts, so I thought it was time to bring in other contributors and authors.

Our staff here is a group of highly trained individuals, with a diverse background within a variety of niches in the photography and digital photography field. For most of these people working with digital photos and technology is not just a job, its something they love. Outside of the office they are generally keeping up with the latest and greatest innovations which makes them ideal contributors to our blog. I’m excited for them to share their thoughts with you.

For a number years now cameras have had the ability to time and date stamp photos, soon another dimension will be added to your digital photos - geography. The practice of stamping images with a geographic location is known as “geotagging”. This is currently available to those who wish to do it manually through sites such as Flickr; however, the integration of digital photography technologies, online photo sharing systems and GPS tracking technologies are rapidly making it more feasible for the average shutterbug to geotag his/her images.

“Every photo was taken somewhere. That’s almost always part of the story of the photo,” said Stewart Butterfield, general manager and co-founder of Flickr, which now houses 36 million geotagged photos–roughly 3 percent of its total archive.

As the cost of integrating GPS chips with digital cameras decreases, more and more people will begin to not only have a chronological record of their images, but also a geographic record. Before the advent of digital photography people often invited guests to view their slideshows, but today in the era of photo sharing online many viewers lack an in-person guide. Geotagging is just one more way to provide a comprehensive story about someone’s photos. Imagine touring through the Alps or Italy and upon returning being able to pinpoint the exact location of a particular favorite restaurant or hotel and then recommend it to friends. Geotagging simply is an additional enhancement that increases the usefulness of your digital photos.

It is estimated that on a scale of 1 to 10, geotagging is only a 4 in terms of maturity. Clearly there are future advancements that are being developed to make geotagging a user friendly, simple experience. It will be very interesting to watch this new technology develop.

The image below demonstrates a set of geotagged images and their appearance on a map.

Sources: Flickr, CNET

I came across this story earlier in the week and wanted to share it with everyone. It really demonstrates the power of digital photography and the internet to do good when used correctly. (Apologies to all my friends in Southern California that are die hard USC fans for writing a favorable article about the Buckeyes’ fans).

On September 1st, the Ohio State Buckeyes opened their season at home facing the Youngstown State Penguins. A long time Buckeye fan, Michelle Montgomery was thrilled to attend the home opener and witness her beloved Buckeyes dominate the Penguins, winning 38-6. On the way into the stadium before the game, Michelle found a digital camera in the parking lot. She viewed the pictures on the camera’s digital display and saw photos of a father and son meeting Brutus Buckeye, the OSU mascot. Reluctant to trust campus lost and found to find the camera’s rightful owner, Michelle decided to take matters into her own hands.

Michelle took the camera home, downloaded the images to her computer and then emailed them to 14 of her closest friends and fellow Buckeye fans. She asked them to view the photos and if they did not recognize anyone to pass them along to other friends and Buckeye fans. Hundreds of emails later, John Montgomery opened his email, opened the photos only to recognize himself and his 10 year old son, Noah, posing with Brutus. He was estatic to learn that his camera was safe and Noah was thrilled as well to have the proof that he did meet Brutus Buckeye.

“It shows the power of the Internet, e-mail and the Buckeye network. It’s amazing how many Buckeye fans are out there,” said John, a 1986 Ohio State University graduate.

When I read this story I thought it really captured how good people combined with technology can achieve things that would have not been previously possible.